Claim process8 min readUpdated: April 25, 2026

How to complain to an airline after a delay or cancellation

A good request is not long. A good request is specific: flight, date, route, what happened, what you are looking for and evidence to support it.

Main guide for this topic: Air passenger rights

Start with facts, not emotions

Complaints to the airline should be clear and verifiable. Before sending, prepare the flight number, date, departure airport, arrival airport, booking reference and a short description of the disturbance.

If you had a connection, please provide the final destination from the entire reservation, not just the segment that was delayed. With a missed connection, it is often how late you were at the last airport that matters, not just how late the first flight was.

It is not necessary to write a long emotional description. The airline needs enough information to find the flight, understand the basis of the claim and see what evidence you are providing.

  • flight number and date
  • route and final destination
  • booking reference or ticket number
  • planned and actual arrival time

Next step

Find out if you are owed up to EUR 600 in compensation.

The quick check combines flight details, route distance and basic evidence to assess your right.

Clearly separate what you are looking for

If you are asking for a fixed fee due to delay, cancellation or denied boarding, write it directly. If you are asking for a ticket refund, hotel or meal reimbursement, put it as a separate line item.

Mixing refunds, vouchers, airport care and fixed compensation often creates confusion. Support then only answers the easiest part, for example the ticket refund, and ignores the fee.

It is better to write three short requests than one long message asking everything at once. This makes it easier to prove later what you were really looking for.

Attach the evidence in a neat package

Attach the reservation confirmation, boarding pass or check-in confirmation, airline messages and proof of actual arrival with the complaint. If you are asking for expenses, please attach receipts.

If you don't have all the documents, send what you have and clearly write what is missing. Missing one document doesn't have to mean the end, but it's better to be transparent than to send a vague request.

Give the evidence an understandable name: ticket, boarding-pass, cancellation-message, hotel-receipt. It seems small, but it reduces errors in manual processing.

Case file

What Let Kasni organizes first

  • exact flight, date, route and booking reference
  • scheduled and actual arrival time
  • airline's stated reason and the evidence behind it
  • receipts for meals, hotel, transfer or a new ticket

Use the official channel

Most airlines have a web form or portal for complaints. If there is an official channel, use it first. After sending, save the confirmation, screenshot and reference number.

If you are sending an email, save the sent message and the automatic reply. Without proof of sending and receiving, it is later more difficult to claim that the complaint was filed on time.

Do not send the same request to ten addresses on the same day. This usually does not speed up the subject, it creates confusion. It is better to have a clear request, then a proper follow-up if there is no answer.

Follow the deadlines and response

After sending, make a short note: date of complaint, channel, reference number and what you have attached. If the airline asks for a refill, note when you sent it.

If a reply arrives, don't just look at whether it says accepted or rejected. Check the reason. Denial due to extraordinary circumstances, weather, air traffic control or technical problem should be specific enough to be verifiable.

If there is no response within the relevant time frame or the response is generic, the next step may be a further warning, regulatory filing or legal assessment. Before escalation, however, check whether the basis of the request is realistic.

When it makes sense to ask for help

If the case is clean, you can try it yourself. If there is a connection, redirection, rejection, unclear reason or communication in multiple languages, help can save time.

Before or after the complaint, letkasni.rs can check whether the case makes sense, what is missing and how to avoid losing the request due to bad procedures.

Help is especially useful when you receive a partial response: for example, part of the ticket was refunded, but the fixed fee was not answered, or the hotel costs were acknowledged, but the reason for the delay was not explained. Then you need to know what is still open.

If you are submitting the request yourself, please save all receipts. If you turn on the service later, proper prior communication allows for a faster assessment and fewer repetitions of the same questions.

This is especially important with family and group bookings, where one slip in documentation can slow down all passengers.

Professional review

Why we do not stop at a generic rejection

Airlines often expect individual passengers to give up after the first short answer. A structured file, knowledge of the rules and procedural pressure change the speed and quality of the response.

Expect the process to take some time

Serious services openly state that simple cases can be resolved quickly, but disputed cases can take months, especially if the airline refuses, asks for amendments or the case goes to a regulator or court.

That's why it's important to keep a neat folder from the start. If after three months you need to refill the item, you don't want to search for the boarding pass through old messages or remember who said what at the gate.

A good claim is not just one message. It is a process: sending, confirming receipt, following the deadline, replying, supplementing, eventual escalation and deciding whether to continue.

Route, timing and airline responsibility

For how to complain to an airline after a delay or cancellation, first check whether the route is protected, then what actually happened, and only then which claim makes sense. Use Air passenger rights for the baseline rule and amounts, while this page checks the concrete scenario and the evidence that changes it.

The best approach is to build a short timeline. Write down the scheduled time, actual time, where you were when the problem happened, what the airline offered, what you accepted and what you paid yourself. That timeline later decides whether the case is about fixed compensation, ticket refund, expense reimbursement or only care rights.

If the case involves arrival delay, a missed connection, rerouting or an overnight wait, also check flight delay compensation. Most practical passenger questions eventually depend on how late the whole journey ended and whether the reason was within the airline's control.

Person reviewing documents beside a laptop

Documents to save for review

The strongest evidence is evidence from the same day: boarding pass, booking confirmation, airline messages, app screenshot, departures-board photo, receipts for food, hotel or transfer and any written information received at the airport.

If the reason was explained verbally, write down the exact wording, time and place. If the reason changed, keep every version. The difference between a technical fault, air traffic control, bad weather, strike and crew shortage is not a formality; it is often the line between a strong and weak claim.

In the claim, do not only say that you want compensation. Include flight number, date, route, booking reference, scheduled and actual arrival time, a short timeline and a clear separation between fixed compensation and expenses you want reimbursed.

What if the airline rejects the claim

The airline's first reply is often not a full assessment. It may contain broad wording, an automatically selected category or an answer that covers only one part of the claim. Read it carefully: does it address the exact flight, date, final destination and concrete reason that caused the disruption?

If the answer does not mention evidence, timeline or the measures the airline took, send a short follow-up. You do not need to repeat the whole story. Ask for a precise explanation and attach the most important proof again. That follow-up often separates genuinely weak cases from cases that were only rejected superficially.