Should you claim yourself or use a flight compensation service?
A simple case can be handled yourself. A disputed case needs more discipline: evidence, deadlines, communication, and persistence.
When DIY can make sense
If the flight clearly arrived more than three hours late, the route is covered, the airline does not cite extraordinary circumstances, and you have the documents, a DIY claim can be reasonable.
The key is to submit a clear claim through the official airline channel.
When a service adds value
A service becomes more useful when the case is unclear: missed connection, partial rerouting, disputed cancellation reason, rejected claim, or multilingual communication.
The value is not only form submission. The value is assessing whether the case is worth pursuing and what the next best step is.
Compare cost and time
If a service charges only on success, the main question is whether trading part of the recovered amount for less work and better process is worth it.
The letkasni.rs model is simple: no upfront cost and a fee only if the case is recovered.
A good service does not promise everything
If someone guarantees payment before checking route, cause, and documents, that is a weak signal. Flight compensation depends on details.
A better approach is conservative assessment, clear explanation, and a next step that makes sense.